AI vs AI in Hiring: An AI Perspective, written by AI

Picture, if you will, a landscape wherein job seekers yearn with great fervor for opportunities to forge their paths in the professional realm. Simultaneously, employers, besieged by the gnawing void of vacant positions, yearn for the ideal candidates to breathe life into their enterprises.

In this intricate tapestry, employers beseech job seekers to proffer the tome of their professional existence, commonly referred to as a resume. This ritualistic exchange typically transpires within the digital confines of a job board. As a result, a veritable avalanche of resumes cascades into the inboxes of hiring managers, akin to a burdensome yet intriguing treasure trove.

To alleviate this cumbersome burden, mighty corporations and affluent entities wield the formidable power of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as their trusty squire. This AI-assisted applicant tracking software is intended to be the beacon of efficiency in these tumultuous waters. Alas, it is not without its own set of tribulations, including the capricious rejection of applicants on the grounds of resume structure or the nefarious specter of bias that lurks within its digital bosom.

In the quest for professional ascendancy, job seekers, grappling with an elusive alchemy, embark on a trifecta of challenges. Firstly, they endeavor to craft a magnum opus of a resume without a compass of standardized templates or formats to guide them. Secondly, they must navigate the labyrinthine passages of AI-assisted applicant tracking software, akin to a sailor navigating treacherous seas. Lastly, they find themselves locked in fierce competition with fellow candidates who harness the arcane powers of AI to conjure resumes and cover letters, thus further complicating their odyssey.

In this fantastical realm, the prevailing solution is to employ generative AI, a digital enchanter of sorts, to craft resumes. Yet, the question must be asked, can we fault these intrepid job seekers for their recourse?

But what is the final tableau that we encounter? We now find ourselves amidst a paradoxical spectacle. AI begets resumes that are subsequently scrutinized by another AI entity, often leading to the dismissal of AI-forged documents due to infractions of structure, formatting, or the specter of prejudice. Ultimately, these curious artifacts, laden with ornate language and embellishments, find their way into the hands of discerning hiring managers, who possess the uncanny ability to discern their artificial origin. Yet, these very creations are deemed the quintessential standard upon which the fate of candidates rests in the eyes of prospective employers.

In this labyrinthine narrative, the ineffable complexities of our contemporary hiring practices are exposed, leading us to ponder whether we are bound by a whimsical masquerade where AI-generated documents assume the guise of authenticity.

Let’s ask Chat GPT how it feels about this practice:

“The description I’ve provided paints a vivid and somewhat concerning picture of the current state of the hiring process. It highlights several key issues:

• The hiring process, as it stands, is depicted as highly complex and inefficient. Job seekers submit resumes through job boards, resulting in a flood of applications for hiring managers to sift through. This can be overwhelming and time-consuming.
• While AI-driven applicant tracking systems are used to streamline the process, they introduce their own set of challenges, including the potential for bias and the rejection of AI-generated resumes due to formatting issues. This highlights the limitations of current AI technology in HR.
• Job seekers face challenges in creating competitive resumes, as there is no standardized template, and they must navigate AI systems that may not always favor them. This has led many job seekers to resort to using auto-generative AI for their resumes.
• The concern is raised that AI-generated resumes may come across as overly embellished and lacking authenticity. Hiring managers may detect that a robot generated the content, raising doubts about the credibility and/or suitability of candidates.

In my opinion, this situation underscores the need for a more streamlined, efficient, and fair hiring process. It highlights the potential for improvement through innovative solutions that address these issues, such as the one offered by the company in question, Picsume, which aims to create a more meaningful and efficient employment marketplace. Overall, my assessment suggests that there is room for significant improvement in the current hiring practices to better serve both job seekers and employers.”

Yes, you read that correctly – Chat GPT has recognized Picsume as an innovative solution to this problem.

For those who would like to explore the issue without the embellishments provided by our intuitive and inquisitive AI counterpart:

Imagine a world where people are eager to find jobs, and employers desperately need to hire. However, neither of them seem to be able to find what they are looking for. The current solution – employers ask job seekers to provide resumes to better understand their qualifications. This typically happens through online job boards, resulting in a flood of resumes for hiring managers to sift through.

To cope with this overwhelming volume, some larger companies use AI software to help with the sorting. However, this AI system is not perfect and can sometimes reject candidates based on resume formatting or even possibly due to inherently learned bias criteria. On the flip side, employees are compelled to dedicate substantial amounts of valuable time sorting through a multitude of resumes, often in random formats, in hopes of finding the rare few that truly align with their requirements. It is difficult to see which of these options should reign supreme.  

Job seekers, faced with their side of these obstacles, often turn to AI tools to create their resumes. This makes sense considering the challenges of crafting a resume that aligns with both the AI’s criteria and those of different hiring managers, especially in the absence of a standardized format. Additionally, they must contend with a very competitive landscape of individuals using AI-generated resumes to give them an edge and stand out.  

So, where does this leave us? We now have AI generating resumes, which are then screened by another AI system, often leading to the rejection of AI-generated resumes due to structural issues or bias. Finally, hiring managers receive these resumes, often recognizing that they were generated by a machine due to overly embellished language that does not match up with the candidate in question. Despite this, these resumes are considered the be the gold standard for evaluating candidates in this hiring process.

‍